Handicapping the U.S. Open cover

Handicapping the U.S. Open

By


No tournament messes more with a professional golfer’s psyche than the U.S. Open.
The sadists who set up the course generally want to insure that no golfer can reasonably be expected to break par. Thus, picking a winner is extremely difficult. Most of the best players have at least one weakness that they will need to overcome in order to pull off a victory.





NoteStream NoteStream

NoteStreams are readable online but they’re even better in the free App!

The NoteStream™ app is for learning about things that interest you: from music to history, to classic literature or cocktails. NoteStreams are truly easy to read on your smartphone—so you can learn more about the world around you and start a fresh conversation.

For a list of all authors on NoteStream, click here.




Read the NoteStream below, or download the app and read it on the go!

Save to App


Handicapping the U.S. Open

U.S. Open

No tournament messes more with a professional golfer’s psyche than the U.S. Open.

The sadists who set up the course generally want to insure that no golfer can reasonably be expected to break par. Of all the courses on the U.S. Open rotation, Oakmont is considered to one of, in not the, most difficult.

Very high rough, length and lightning fast greens are expected to wreak havoc this week. I have heard experts predicting the winning score will be between 5 and 8 over par.

Peaceful Illusion

Oakmont Country Club

Peaceful Illusion

The website makes the course look relatively benign, but apparently it can be made to play extremely difficult. Thus, picking a winner is extremely difficult. Most of the best players have at least one weakness that they will need to overcome in order to pull off a victory.

Jason Day

It is hard to know whether accuracy, length or short game will prove most important (I tend toward the latter), but problems in any aspect could spell disaster. In the end, experience and mental toughness are likely to be the deciding factor. Here are my picks in order:

Jason Day: Why he will win: Best all-around game. Great distance, great short game, great mental attitude. He has finished top 10 in each of the last three Opens; the most recent being impacted by his vertigo.

Why he will miss the cut: Probably not going to happen, but driving accuracy looked to be a problem in his last couple of starts, with some indifferent iron play at the Memorial.

Dustin Johnson:

L.E.MORMILE / Shutterstock

Dustin Johnson:

Why he will win: Most talented golfer, length off the tee and sneaky good short game. Top 5 the last two years, and playing well currently.

Why he will miss the cut: Again, probably not, but he remains the biggest head case on tour. Should win, but may get in his own way.

McIlroy And Spieth

Rory McIlroy: Why he will win: Incredible power, plenty of big game experience. Top 10 last year. Why he will miss the cut: Short game seems shaky; especially putting. He is returning to a conventional putting grip so maybe it will jump start his game. If he does not putt better, he could be on an early flight out.

Jordan Spieth: Why he will win: Great intensity, phenomenal short game. The defending champion figures to be on the leaderboard again, if he keeps making putts. Why he will miss the cut: For Jordan, it is all about hitting fairways. He may give up too many strokes getting his ball back into play from the high rough.

Brooks Koepka:

Why he will win: Great natural talent. Similar to Dustin Johnson with length and solid short game. In two prior Opens he has two top 20’s, including T4 in 2014. He is also playing well.

Why he will miss the cut: Does not yet seem ready to close the deal. I expect him to be well up the leaderboard, but will falter in the stretch with DJ.

Henrik Stenson:

Why he will win: He is going to stick that damn 3 wood in every fairway. Easily one of the best ball strikers, he may be able to avoid trouble up to the green. Finished 27, or better in each of the last three opens.

Why he will miss the cut: Despite the placid exterior, he always looks like he is about to explode. A few three putts from 10 feet may get in his head. Watch out, however, if he comes out hot.

Adam Scott:

Debbie Wong, Shutterstock

Adam Scott:

Why he will win: Another great ball striker. Like Stenson, he may be able to avoid trouble before the green. Top 10 in last two Opens.

Why he will miss the cut: Scott’s game will live and die with the putter. He has made as good an adjustment from the anchored putter as anyone, but these greens will require precision.

Phil Michelson:

Why he will win: Destiny. No one deserves this more than Lefty. A rash of “close but no cigar” finishes in past U.S. Opens makes him the sentimental favorite. He has plenty of length and everyone knows about the short game. His game looked great last week, so he is in form.

Why he will miss the cut: Phil wants this one too bad. I think he will be pressing. The aggressive putting may come back to bite as putts keep rolling out. First in my heart, but he may prove to be his own worst enemy.

Rose and Oosthuizen

Justin Rose: Why he will win: Justin has a very good record in U.S. Opens, including a victory in 2013. Solid striker, with plenty of distance. Why he will miss the cut: His putting seems totally out of sorts. Unless it improves dramatically, Rose will be heading home early.

Louie Oosthuizen: Why he will win: What a great swing. He has the entire package, and finished second last year. (Probably should have won.) Louie is a streaky golfer that could get hot, although 2016 has been disappointing so far. Why he will miss the cut: Not playing very well at present.

Honorable Mention & Save Your Money

Honorable Mention: Matt Kuchar, good record in recent opens, and playing well; Ricky Fowler, until recently had excellent results in majors; Hideki Matsuyama, great young player, although first major win at an Open seems unlikely; Charl Schwartzel, seems to rise to the occasion in majors, with good recent Open results.

Save Your Money: Bubba Watson, does not seem to have the game or temperament for the U.S. Open with two consecutive missed cuts; Sergio Garcia, maybe if I jinx him, he will step up, but I think the course will frustrate him; Jimmy Walker, the magic seems to be gone; Danny Willett, seems to resting on Master’s victory so I do not expect a second major.

Weekly Observation

A Few to Watch: Bryson DeChambeau, Justin Thomas, Daniel Berger and Paul Casey

Weekly Observation: After last week, I would love to see Stricker and Michelson paired together again in the final group on Sunday.

Paul Laubach is completely unqualified to provide expertise with respect to golf course rankings and design, however, he is a highly opinionated golf addict who believes everyone should be entitled to his thoughts. He has recently released Confessions of a Golfaholic: A Guide to Playing America’s Top 100 Public Golf Courses; now available in hardcover edition. Please visit tophundredgolf.com regularly for more (im)practical information.